Nokia Corporation v. Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
UK Court of Appeal submission
INTA Position: the Court should refer to the Court of Justice of the EU the question whether the EU Counterfeit Goods Regulation permits local customs authorities to seize counterfeit goods that are in transit but not intended for sale in a member state
Outcome: UK Court of Appeal referred the case to the Court of Justice of the EU and granted INTA formal leave to intervene in the subsequent hearing
Court of Justice written submission
Court of Justice oral hearing submission
Oral argument was heard on November 18, 2010 in Luxembourg. INTA was represented by Nicholas Saunders and Matthew Harris.
INTA Position: the EU Counterfeit Goods Regulation is intended to permit local customs authorities to seize counterfeit goods that are in transit but not intended for sale in a member state
Outcome: The Advocate General's opinion will be presented at a public hearing on February 3, 2011. The date of the court's judgment is not yet known.
Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc.
INTA Position: The U.S. Supreme Court should grant certiorari in order to resolve a conflict among the courts of appeal regarding the knowledge required to impose contributory infringement liability on the operator of an online marketplace for the sale, by third parties, of counterfeit and infringing merchandise
Outcome: The petition for a writ of certiorari was denied