Press Releases

INTA Argues NFTs and Intangible Goods Are Within Lanham Act’s Scope

Published: June 18, 2024

New York, New York—June 18, 2024The International Trademark Association (INTA) has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ryder Ripps, Jeremy Cahen, No. 24-879, a case considering whether non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are “goods” for purposes of Section 1125(a), the unfair competition provision of the Lanham Act.

In this case, Appellants/Defendants Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen distributed allegedly infringing NFTs utilizing Appellee/Plaintiff Yuga Labs’ BORED APE YACHT CLUB family of trademarks.

In opposing Yuga Labs’ motion for summary judgment on its false designation of origin claim, the defendants defined NFTs solely as software tokens and argued that NFTs are, therefore, ineligible for trademark protection because they are intangible goods. Thus, the defendants argued, Yuga Labs had no valid trademark rights to enforce. In support, the defendants noted that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had rejected Yuga Labs’ applications to register several of its trademarks because NFTs are not goods in trade. The defendants further argued that the U.S. Supreme Court has required tangibility for trademark protection under Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23, 27 (2003).

The district court rejected the defendants’ arguments, citing the Southern District of New York’s decision in Hermès International v. Rothschild, 590 F. Supp. 3d 647, 655 (S.D.N.Y. 2022), which stated that Dastar did not rule on whether the Lanham Act covers intangible goods and instead found that NFTs qualify as goods under the Lanham Act.

INTA filed an amicus brief in support of the appellee/plaintiff arguing that the Lanham Act extends protection to use of marks in relation to NFTs and intangible goods because:

  • The Lanham Act refers to the registration and use of trademarks in relation to any goods or services, without limiting definition;
  • The case law, including the Supreme Court’s decision in Dastar, supports the finding that the NFTs at issue and intangible goods generally are protected by the Lanham Act; and
  • The Lanham Act focuses on consumer perception and the meaning of trademarks to consumers, and, as the district court noted, consumers associated Yuga Lab’s trademarks with the underlying assets and benefits it offered.

Read INTA’s previously released white papers on Trademarks in the Metaverse and NFTs.

About the International Trademark Association
The International Trademark Association (INTA) is a global association of brand owners and professionals dedicated to supporting trademarks and complementary intellectual property (IP) to foster consumer trust, economic growth, and innovation, and committed to building a better society through brands. Members include nearly 6,400 organizations, representing more than 36,000 individuals (trademark owners, professionals, and academics) from 181 countries, who benefit from the Association’s global trademark resources, policy development, education and training, and international network. Founded in 1878, INTA is headquartered in New York City, with offices in Beijing, Brussels, Santiago, Singapore, and the Washington, D.C., Metro Area, and representatives in Amman, Nairobi, and New Delhi. For more information, visit inta.org.

Media Contact:
JC Darné
212-642-1774
[email protected]

Topics
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.