Amicus Brief

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression Inc.

Published: January 1, 2004

Court

U.S. Supreme Court

Our Position

A defendant asserting the fair use defense need not prove the absence of likely confusion if the three statutory prerequisites for the defense in Section 33(b)(4) of the Lanham Act are met.

Outcome

The Court held that a party asserting a fair use defense in a trademark infringement action does not bear the burden of negating likelihood of confusion.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.