Law & Practice
UNITED STATES: Disclaimer on ‘ZERO’ Ends Coca-Cola’s Decade-Long Battle
Published: September 16, 2020
Rui W. Geissler Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C. Fairfax, Virginia, USA INTA Bulletins—North America Subcommittee
Verifier
Rachel Rudensky Akerman LLP West Palm Beach, Florida, USA INTA Bulletins—North America Subcommittee
A challenge to Coca-Cola’s registration of “ZERO” trademarks suffered a setback after Coca-Cola accepted a disclaimer in a battle over genericness.
On August 3, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) dismissed the appeal as moot made by Royal Crown Company, Inc., and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. (collectively, “Royal Crown”) from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Royal Crown Company, Inc., and Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company, Appeal No. 2019-2088 (Fed Cir. Aug. 3, 2020) [not precedential].
Starting from 2008, Royal Crown filed multiple oppositions against Coca-Cola Company (Coca-Cola) for its 16 trademark applications containing the term “ZERO”, claiming that each of the marks is “generic or merely descriptive of the zero-calorie features of the beverages,” and argued that each of the registrations must be denied “absent the entry of a disclaimer of the term ‘zero.’”
The TTAB first held that all the marks could be registered even without a disclaimer of ZERO, and dismissed Royal Crown’s oppositions because it failed to prove ZERO’s genericness for zero-calorie products while Coca-Cola has proved that it had acquired distinctiveness on ZERO.
Royal Crown appealed, and CAFC vacated the decision because the TTAB applied the wrong legal standard for genericness of the term “ZERO” and failed to make an “express finding” on the term’s descriptiveness “on the scale ranging from generic to merely descriptive.”
Following the remand, Coca-Cola filed a motion to add the disclaimer to each of its applications regarding ZERO. Noting that the disclaimer was the only relief requested by Royal Crown, the TTAB granted Coca-Cola’s motion and dismissed Royal Crown’s oppositions again.
Royal Crown then filed the current appeal claiming that granting Coca-Cola’s motion was “procedurally improper and thus arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.” Second, Royal Crown argued that the TTAB neglected its obligation to render a reasoned decision. Finally, Royal Crown raised the possibility of Coca-Cola’s filing new applications for marks including the term “ZERO” again.
CAFC supported the TTAB’s decision on granting the disclaimer and stated that it was within the TTAB’s discretion and that Royal Crown had been “entirely fulfilled” with the only relief it had asked. The entry of the disclaimer therefore rendered the appeal moot. As regarding a future, possibly similar application, the CAFC stated that “litigation is conducted for the purpose of obtaining relief, not an advisory opinion.”
As there was no case or controversy to decide, CAFC dismissed the appeal.
Although every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of this article, readers are urged to check independently on matters of specific concern or interest. Law & Practice updates are published without comment from INTA except where it has taken an official position.
© 2020 International Trademark Association
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
To find out more please see our Cookies Policy and Privacy Policy.
These cookies are used to identify a user’s browser as the visitor goes from page to page on the Site. These are session cookies, which means that the cookie is deleted when you leave the Site. It is an integral piece of the Site software and used to let the server know which users are on the Site at any given time and make certain parts of the Site easier to use.
|
|
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our Site. The cookies collect information in anonymous form, including the numbers of visitors to the Site, where visitors have come to the Site from, the pages they visited and how they have interacted with tools on the Site like search and embedded media players. We use the information to compile statistical reports of our users’ browsing patterns so that we can improve the Site.
|
|
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
These cookies are used to deliver advertising relevant to the interests of visitors to our Site. They are persistent, which means they will remain on your device after you leave the Site.
- Facebook (Ad Pixel)
- Google (Ad Pixel)
- LinkedIn (Ad Pixel)
- Quattro Anonymous
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!