Law & Practice
UNITED STATES: Local Mississippi ‘Midtown’ Battle Resolved
Published: April 7, 2021

Jessica Bradley Jones Day Washington, D.C., USA Right of Publicity Committee
Verifier

Jonathan H. Love Parsons Behle & Latimer, PLC Salt Lake City, Utah, USA INTA Bulletins—North America Subcommittee
A recent case provided a rare look into state law infringement proceedings and confirmed that the analysis closely tracks that in U.S. federal courts.
Ruling exclusively under Mississippi state law, the Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed the denial of a liquor store’s trademark and trade name infringement claims over the use of the word “Midtown” by a similarly named liquor store. T.M.T., LLC v. Midtown Market Wine & Spirits, LLC, No. 2019-CA-01199-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Jan. 19, 2021).
In its decision, the court analyzed the factors disputed by the parties under the seven-factor test established by the Fifth Circuit for federal trademark infringement. The court upheld the lower court’s decision that one business is not allowed the sole use of the generic and geographical term “Midtown” in its service mark.
The dispute arose in 2018 between plaintiff T.M.T., LLC’s “Midtown Wine & Spirits” and defendant Midtown Market Wine & Spirits. Both businesses were located in the “midtown” area of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The plaintiff began using its MIDTOWN WINE & SPIRITS mark in February 2017 but did not register it with the Mississippi Secretary of State until September 2018. In the meantime, in May 2018, the defendant formed, registered as a business name, and began using “Midtown Market Wine & Spirits LLC.” After several instances of alleged confusion, the plaintiff sued for injunctive relief. The lower court held a trial and denied its claim, and the plaintiff then appealed.
On appeal, the court focused on the lower court’s analysis of three factors—the type of trademark, the defendant’s intent, and actual confusion—and utilized both Mississippi state and federal court precedent in its review. The court found no error in the determination that the plaintiff’s mark was weak given that “midtown” was a common geographical term that had not acquired secondary meaning and the extensive third-party use of “midtown” in business names.
The court also affirmed the finding on intent based on the lack of evidence of passing off. It further found no error in the determination of no actual confusion, given that the relatively few instances of alleged confusion did not concern business transactions with likely customers. Given the lack of a showing of success on the merits, injunctive relief was not warranted.
Author Insight
While the majority of trademark disputes in the United States occur at the federal level, businesses should be aware of state trademark regimes. The issues and infringement analysis often parallel that in federal court, but state law can vary, including in the remedies available. Most notably, although punitive damages are not available under the Lanham Act, such damages are available under some state statutes.
Although every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of this article, readers are urged to check independently on matters of specific concern or interest. Law & Practice updates are published without comment from INTA except where it has taken an official position.
© 2021 International Trademark Association
To enable certain features that may be available or become available on the Site, our server will assign your browser a unique identification number stored in a file on your computer (a “cookie”, or similar technology). Cookies by themselves cannot be used to find out the identity of any user. This unique identification number will automatically identify your browser to our computers whenever you interact on our Site.
Please review our Cookies Policy to learn more.
These cookies are used to identify a user’s browser as the visitor goes from page to page on the Site. These are session cookies, which means that the cookie is deleted when you leave the Site. It is an integral piece of the Site software and used to let the server know which users are on the Site at any given time and make certain parts of the Site easier to use.
|
|
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
These cookies are used to collect information about how visitors use our Site. The cookies collect information in anonymous form, including the numbers of visitors to the Site, where visitors have come to the Site from, the pages they visited and how they have interacted with tools on the Site like search and embedded media players. We use the information to compile statistical reports of our users’ browsing patterns so that we can improve the Site.
|
|
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
These cookies are used to deliver advertising relevant to the interests of visitors to our Site. They are persistent, which means they will remain on your device after you leave the Site.
- Quattro Anonymous
Please enable Functionality Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!