Advocacy Group
International Amicus Committee
Advocacy Group
- Anticounterfeiting Committee
- Brand Restrictions Committee
- Copyright Committee
- Data Protection Committee
- Designs Committee
- Emerging Issues Committee
- Enforcement Committee
- Famous and Well-Known Marks Committee
- Geographical Indications Committee
- Harmonization of Trademark Law and Practice Committee
- Indigenous Rights Committee
- International Amicus Committee
- Internet Committee
- Legislation and Regulation Committee
- Non-Traditional Marks Committee
- Parallel Imports Committee
- Right of Publicity Committee
- Trademark Office Practices Committee
- Unfair Competition Committee
Communications Group
Resources Group
- Academic Committee
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee
- Brands and Innovation Committee
- Commercialization of Brands Committee
- In-House Practitioners Committee
- INTA Bulletins Committee
- Law Firm Committee
- Leadership Development Committee
- Publications Committee
- Trademark Administrators Committee
- The Trademark Reporter Committee
- Young Practitioners Committee
Mission
The International Amicus Committee (IAC) provides expertise concerning trademark and other intellectual property-related laws to courts and trademark offices around the world through the submission of amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs or similar filings. Committee work includes evaluating requests to file, monitoring leading cases, and drafting submissions.
Leadership
COMMITTEE LEADERS
Chair
Antonio Turco
CPST Intellectual Property
Canada
Vice Chair
Anthony Dreyer
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
United States
STAFF LIAISON
Maysa Razavi
Subcommittee Leaders
Asia Pacific Amicus Subcommittee Chair
Vaibhav Vutts
Vutts & Associates LLP, Advocates
India
Canada Amicus Subcommittee Chair
Mark Robbins
Bereskin & Parr LLP
Canada
Europe Amicus Subcommittee Chair
Marina Perraki
Tsibanoulis & Partners
Greece
Latin America Amicus Subcommittee Chair
Néstor Morera
MORERA & CHAHIN
Costa Rica
United States Amicus Subcommittee Chair
David Bernstein
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
United States
Highlights
Cases and Requests Needed
Please help the IAC identify key cases at the appellate level which impact trademark law in your country or region, especially outside North America and Europe. To submit an amicus request, please see INTA’s policies and procedures.
Recent Cases
Case C-421/20 ACACIA S.R.L v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
Court: Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
The applicable law to the supplementary remedies/sanctions requested in a case dealing with Registered Community Designs (RCD) should be either lex fori or the place where the act of infringement took place, i.e., where there was illegal use of the RCD, unless there are disputed actions of multiple infringements in many European Union countries.
Case R 1304/2020-G, Der Grüne Punkt Duales System Deutschland GmbH ./. Halston Properties, s.r.o. GmbH
Tribunal: Grand Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office
Where a trademark indicates aspects regarding the disposal of the packaging of the marketed goods, the trademark can be genuinely used for the various packaged goods because it will allow the consumer to choose between an undertaking that—being part of the association that owns the trademark—has a certain system in place allowing for disposal of the packaging of the respective goods vs. undertakings that do not have such a system in place
VIP Products, LLC V. Jack Daniel’s Property, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
INTA Position: The Court should grant Jack Daniel’s Property’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.as the panel’s decision in this case improperly extends Rogers v. Grimaldi to the use of trademarks on any commercial good arguably having some “expressive” quality.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. BOOKING.COM B.V..
Court: U.S. Supreme Court
INTA Position: The Court should consider survey evidence when deciding whether a mark is generic or descriptive and should not be limited to cases involving “coined” terms. Furthermore, the Court should affirm that there is no per se rule for the protectability of generic marks with addition by an online business of a generic top-level domain (‘.com’).
LTTB LLC V. REDBUBBLE INC.
Court: United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit
INTA Position: The Court should reverse and remand the case to the district court to reconsider its decision in view of the district court’s incorrect holding regarding the legal standard for and misapplication of the doctrine of aesthetic functionality.
